Didn't Georgiev's original description match Shields and not Sankey? Didn't Georgiev subsequently identify Shields as his attacker? Daniel Foggo's article 7th August 2005 article in the Telegraph is a good one about the case.
Wasn't Michael the only non-Bulgarian in the line up? Wasn't he made to wear a white shirt and handcuffed for hours in the main reception in front of other witnesses? This case screams of injustice and would not be held up in any court of law in this country.
i think that this is absoloutley disgusting to hold a british man in a foreign jail. although in his own country now he did not do it so let him free.
Michael Shields is GUILTY! The court said so. Michael had lawyers, there were witnesses; there were appeals... It all amounted to him being guilty.They can write a dozen songs singing what an angel he is, sponsor another concert and sell it out, write a NY Times Bestseller, sell T-shirts with Michael's innocent face printed all over them, nevertheless, he will remain guilty and the guy whose head he cracked open will still remain an invalid with a family to take care of.People who still support Shields have no hearts. They should all be sentenced to a hit with a 4 kg stone on the head by a drunken junkie - to get the feel of it.Maybe that will fix their perspective.
I think you're missing the point. There is a lot of corruption in the Bulgarian system. Why was Michael made to change into a white t-shirt and paraded infront of witnesses before being put on an idententy parade. Why was he the only non-bulgarian in the identity parade. Why was he handfuffed for 4 hours in the police station waiting room for all to see? If this country would have meant that this case would have been thrown out of court. The family are fighting for justice for both Michael and the victim in this appalling. I would suggest you consider what they are going through and look at the full picture before jumping on the Guilty bandwagon.
Michael is not guilty because he is from Liverpool and he is British. It doesn't matter what Michael is done since he is British he is innocent. He went to celebrate in Varna,Bulgaria but instead of drinking as all his friend he decided to go to bed because he is good boy from Liverpool. Michael almost killed innocent Bulgarian but he is not guilty. How he could be guilty? He is British from Liverpool!!!
i am bulgarian and i know the evidences of the case they are different i think that the british newspapers tel many lies to youi'm sorry for my bad english
Peter Sutcliffe is innocent! - will you sign my petition?
Michael Shields is guilty. No amount of badgering by his family can take away the fact he was picked out of a line up by different witnesses and the attacker. Guilty as charged he should be in a Bulgarian prison - for life. Murderer. Even if he didn't use the brick - he was in the group. He should have not joined in. I wouldn't.
Hitler bad Shields good! British assholes come to Bulgaria you'll never came back alive
Post a Comment